Site rebuild in progress

COI tracking software pricing

Most quotes in this category show up only after a vendor knows your volume and how deeply you want certificates checked. This page explains the models. It does not list prices.

Updated November 6, 2026 · No dollar amounts in this edition, because none were collected from current public rate cards or quotes.

Why the prices are hard to compare

Search results for COI tracking software pricing rarely land on a menu. The companies in this market usually quote after a conversation, because the same brand sells very different depths. One buyer wants a place to store PDFs and send renewal emails. Another wants a reviewer, human or otherwise, to compare every certificate with a contract exhibit and to chase endorsements. Those are different products. A single “starting at” number, even when a vendor publishes one, hides which depth the starting tier includes.

Two more habits make casual comparisons fail. First, the meter is not standardized. One quote counts vendors, another counts locations, a third counts users, and a fourth counts certificates reviewed per year. Second, implementation is sometimes inside the subscription and sometimes a separate project. A lower subscription with a large onboarding fee can cost more in year one than a higher subscription with onboarding included. Year two can reverse the comparison. Ask for both years.

Public list prices for the vendors named in our November 6, 2026 name list: unknown. We did not collect quotes, and we do not treat advertising slogans about “lower cost” or “no hidden fees” as a price.

Pricing models you will be offered

These are shapes, not a menu with amounts. A given vendor may combine two of them. Confirm which meter you would be on.

Per vendor or per certificate

The fee moves with how many third parties you track, or how many certificates are in the system. Ask whether inactive vendors count, whether a vendor on three properties counts once or three times, and what happens in the month a project adds a wave of subcontractors. Ask what an overage costs if you cross the tier mid-term, and whether the tier resets down if the count falls.

Per location, property, or project

Common when the pain is a portfolio or a set of jobs rather than a single vendor master. Ask whether the meter is buildings, legal entities, active jobs, or doors. A property-management buyer and a general contractor can both be “per location” and mean different units.

Platform fee plus users

A base subscription, then a charge for additional people who log in. Ask who needs an account: risk, property managers, project engineers, read-only auditors, and outside owners. A price that looks small per user becomes a different number when every site manager must touch exceptions. Also ask whether reviewers at the vendor’s own service desk are included or billed as a managed service.

Verification tier

This is the split that matters most. Storing a file and emailing a reminder is a different service from reading the certificate against your requirements, and that is different again from collecting endorsements or confirming details with a broker or carrier. Quotes that look far apart are often selling different tiers under similar names. Ask for a line-by-line description of what the fee includes, in the language of the verify step, not in the language of a slogan.

Implementation or onboarding

Setup of requirement templates, import of the certificates you already hold, and training. Ask what is inside the subscription, what is a one-time fee, and what you are expected to clean up before import. Historical files that are misnamed and unscanned are the usual surprise. The vendor’s timeline is unknown until they see your files. Do not accept a generic duration from a webpage as your plan.

Managed service

COI tracking services, sometimes called outsourced tracking, are a team that requests certificates and reviews them, with or without software you can log into. Price this as labor plus a system, not as a login. Ask what your staff still does, how exceptions are escalated, and what the handoff looks like if you cancel: the documents, the status history, and the contact list for agents. A service that cannot export the record leaves you starting over.

What actually moves the number

Use this list in the sales call. If the rep cannot say which of these your quote assumes, you do not have a quote you can compare.

  • How many vendors, and how often the set changes. A stable annual list and a job site that turns over subcontractors every month are different workloads even at the same average count.
  • How many requirement sets. One corporate standard is simpler than a portfolio in which each owner’s exhibit differs.
  • How many lines and endorsements you check. Adding automobile, umbrella, and a required additional-insured endorsement is more review than general liability alone. Your contract decides the list. The vendor COI page explains the fields. It does not set your limits.
  • Whether the certificate alone is acceptable or whether you also collect endorsements and, in some programs, a broker or carrier confirmation.
  • Renewal volume. Annual policies produce one season of chasing. Project-specific certificates produce chasing all year.
  • Who sends the chase messages and how many attempts are included before the item becomes your problem again.
  • Exception rate. Vendors who send the wrong named insured, short limits, or expired files create the work. A quote that assumes clean certificates will not describe your first quarter.
  • History. Keeping the certificate you relied on after it is superseded, and keeping it for your retention schedule, can be inside the fee or an archive tier. Ask. We do not publish a required number of years.
  • Neighboring systems. An integration, single sign-on, or a custom export can be included, optional, or unavailable. Unavailable is a fact you want before you sign. This site does not claim which products connect to which platforms.
  • Leaving. Export of files and the decision log. A cheap year that traps the archive is not a cheap year.

Questions to ask before you sign

  • What unit is billed: vendor, certificate, location, project, user, review, or a combination? What is the definition of that unit in the contract, not in the slide?
  • Which verification steps are included, and which are a higher tier or a professional service?
  • Are renewal chase messages included? How many, and to whom?
  • Are endorsement files included, or only the certificate image?
  • What did you assume about our vendor count and our exception rate? Please restate it in the proposal.
  • What is billed in year one, including onboarding, import, and training, and what is billed in year two if our count does not change?
  • What happens if we add vendors mid-term? What happens if we drop them?
  • Is there a published price list? If yes, ask for the date and the URL or document, and keep a copy. If no, the price is quote-only. Unknown is an acceptable answer. A guessed number is not.
  • Who owns the configuration of our requirement templates if the person who set them up leaves either company?
  • On cancellation, what exactly is exported, in what format, and within how many days? Is there a fee for that export?
  • Does a trial or a pilot convert automatically into a paid term? What in the pilot is discarded?

How to compare two quotes

Put the proposals in your own rows, not in the vendors’ row names. A workable sheet has one row per driver above and a column per finalist. If a cell is “included,” write the limit (for example, chase messages per vendor per renewal, if they gave you one). If they did not give you a limit, write “cap not stated.” Do not fill the cell with a friendly assumption.

Then add a column for the work that stays with your staff either way: someone still owns the requirement language, someone still accepts exceptions, and someone still stops work or payment when that is your rule. Software does not remove those decisions. It can make the missing certificates visible. The minimum tracking habit is the list of decisions you are trying to house. If a proposal does not say where each decision lives, it is not comparable yet.

Free tools, trials, and tracking services

Searches for free COI tracking software usually mean one of three things. Keep them separate.

No license fee

A spreadsheet has no software subscription. It is not free. It costs the hours your staff spend requesting, filing, and noticing expirations, and it costs the misses described in why spreadsheets fail. The spreadsheet guide is the column list and the formulas. A downloadable file is not posted yet. We are not naming a free-software product, because this site is not offering one and we did not test anyone else’s free tier.

A trial or a try-it offer

Some vendors advertise a free trial or a try-it period. OnComply’s advertising, as observed on November 5, 2026, mentioned a free try alongside construction document collection. Other products in this market have advertised trials in earlier ad samples. Length, vendor caps, feature limits, and whether the trial requires a card are specific to each offer and change. We are not stating a trial length. A trial price of zero is not the cost of running the process for a year. Ask what is deleted at the end, and whether the pilot’s reviews carry into production or get redone.

COI tracking services

A service quote is the price of someone else’s labor plus their system. Compare it with the loaded time your coordinators spend now, using your hours, not a figure from an advertisement. We will not tell you that a service saves a particular share of that time. Measure a month of chase time if you need a baseline: hours requesting, hours reviewing, hours rework on bad certificates. That baseline is yours. It is the only ROI math this page supports.

Savings claims

Advertisements in this category sometimes promise hours returned every week, a lower price than unnamed alternatives, or no hidden fees. Treat each as a claim to test. Hours depend on your volume and your current mess. “Lower” requires a comparable scope. “No hidden fees” requires the year-one and year-two stack in writing, including overages, extra entities, and the export if you leave. This site does not repeat the numeric versions of those ads. They were not audited.

There is also a cost to a bad review standard. A cheap tier that marks a file “received” and calls it compliant can be more expensive than a slower review if your contracts require endorsements and you only discover the gap in a claim. That is not a reason to buy the most expensive tier. It is a reason to match the tier to the standard your counsel and broker already told you to use.

What this edition leaves unknown

  • Any dollar price, fee, or discount for any vendor.
  • Which vendors publish a rate card today. We did not do a price-list census. If you have a public page, the corrections address is info@coitracker.com. A future edition can cite it with a date. It will not invent the figure from a sales call we did not join.
  • Typical implementation time, typical exception rates, and typical hours saved. “Typical” would be a made-up average.
  • Whether a specific contract’s insurance requirements are reasonable. That is a broker and counsel question. Pricing the software does not answer it.

Related pages: how to shortlist COI tracking software, vendor COI requests and renewals, and the certificate of insurance tracking homepage. Identity and corrections: about COI Tracker.