COI Tracker

Site rebuild in progress

OnComply fact sheet

A dated fact sheet, not a ranking and not a hands-on test. Claims below are the vendor’s public words unless a sentence says otherwise.

Public page read November 6, 2026 · Published by COI Tracker, an editorial resource

What we read

On November 6, 2026 we read the OnComply homepage. Sentences about the product are limited to that page unless noted. Advertising observed earlier is labeled as advertising. Packaging can change after this date.

What the public page claims

The homepage describes a vendor-onboarding link that collects W-9s, certificates of insurance, licenses, contracts, and other requirements. It says vendors do not create an account. It says the product extracts details, checks each requirement against the customer’s rules, and shows the exceptions. For insurance, it says certificates are read automatically and checked against coverage limits, dates, and insured names. It says expiration dates are watched and renewal links go out automatically, and that a vendor’s permission to work and to be paid can update when a document changes.

The page includes a sample walkthrough with fictional vendor names and future dates. That walkthrough is a demo on the site. It is not a customer and not a result we observed. Ads in September and October 2026 described COI tracking for construction subcontractors alongside W-9s, OSHA certificates, and lien waivers, and mentioned a free try. The November 6 homepage is broader: it also addresses property managers and accounts payable, and it states a trial length.

Typical buyer fit

The homepage names three buyers: general contractors, property managers, and accounts-payable teams. Construction subcontractors and property vendors are both named. The page also says any team that onboards vendors can use it. A fit outside those examples is something you would confirm with the vendor.

Evaluation criteria

These are the criteria on the shortlist guide. A row is filled only when the page we read speaks to it. Everything else stays unknown.

CriterionWhat this fact sheet can say
Requirement modelThe page says each vendor group has a checklist of requirements, and that certificates are checked against limits, dates, and insured names you set. Whether those rules can differ by project and by property at the same time is unknown beyond the claim that groups exist.
IntakeThe page says one link, with no vendor account. Uploads, form fields, and signatures are described. We did not send a link.
VerificationThe page claims automatic reading of a certificate against limits, dates, and insured names, with exceptions sent to the team. Endorsement-form review is not spelled out on the homepage. That depth is unknown.
ExceptionsThe page says the team can see the reason, contact the vendor, or grant an exception, and that work or payment can be blocked until the rule is met. Who is allowed to grant the exception is described as the customer’s policy. The permission detail is unknown.
RenewalsThe page claims expiration watching and automatic renewal links, and says a lapse changes work or pay status until a replacement passes. The lead time you can set is unknown.
Parties and scaleUnknown from the page we read.
Evidence retentionThe page says significant actions go into an audit log. Whether the prior certificate file remains after a renewal is unknown.
ReportingLive “can work” and “can pay” status is the report the page describes. An export is unknown.
Neighboring systemsThe page says decisions can flow to connected systems. It does not name those systems on the homepage we read. Unknown.
Service modelThe page describes software the customer’s team runs, and says setup does not require an onboarding project. That is their claim about effort. We did not time a setup.
Security and accessThe page states tenant isolation, encryption in transit and at rest, extra encryption for sensitive fields, audit logs, role-based access, and extra checks for high-risk actions. Those are the vendor’s security statements. We did not audit them.
Price transparencyThe homepage publishes prices. See the pricing section. They are the vendor’s figures, not a quote we received.

Pricing transparency

On November 6, 2026 the homepage published plan prices: from $29 per month, up to $999 per month for larger organizations, and a 14-day trial that the page says does not require a card. Those numbers are what that page displayed. We did not create an account or complete a checkout, so we do not know which documents, vendor counts, or renewal messages each plan includes. Read the plan table on their site again before you budget. A published starting price is not the cost of a year of reviews. The pricing guide is the list of questions that still apply.